博客
关于我
Brainfuck语言 未定义行为
阅读量:612 次
发布时间:2019-03-12

本文共 4425 字,大约阅读时间需要 14 分钟。

However, Brainfuck (BF) offers a refreshing clarity in this regard, as it incorporates thoughtful design principles that help demystify these complexities. The language's structure and operations are rigorously defined, making it easier to anticipate behavior and write portable, efficient code.

ClearColor

One of the key aspects that became increasingly clear to me while struggling with submission[超时问题](https://huan Chu repo issue) is the importance of understanding the boundaries of alanguage's designed behavior. Each programming language draws a clear line between defined andundefined behavior, and Brainfuck is no exception. While C/C++ leaves much room for interpretation,Brainfuck provides a more concrete framework, even if it's not without its own unique idiosyncrasies.


Cell Size

In Brainfuck, the size and type of each memory cell are critical design considerations. In the classicdistribution, each cell is typically 8 bits (1 byte), a size that remains prevalent due to its efficiency.However, the need to distinguish an end-of-file condition from any possible byte value in non-textualdata has led some implementations to use 16-bit cells. Similarly, 32-bit, 64-bit, and even bignumcells exist, offering virtually unlimited range. While these larger cell sizes provide flexibility, theykann.getObject("Cell size", false);có um problema de desempenho, já que manipular valores em células pode ser mais lento.

Despite these variations, most BF implementations handle input/output in bytes, with optional cell size flexibility. Additionally, many BF interpreters enforce a wrap-around behavior, where incrementing a cell that's at its maximum value resets it to its minimum, and vice versa. This is particularly useful for ensuring predictable behavior without external handling of overflow or underflow.


Array Size

The memory model in Brainfuck often revolves around an array of cells, with the pointer starting at the leftmost cell. While the classic implementation uses a fixed-size array of 30,000 cells, modern interpreters typically allow the array to expand dynamically to accommodate large data, especially for computations involving massive numbers. This dynamic extension is both user-friendly and efficient for memory-intensive tasks, although it may introduce a minor performance overhead.

Different BF implementations also vary in how they handle the pointer's movement beyond the array's boundaries. Some extend the array to the left, while others wrap the pointer around to the opposite end of the array. These approaches have trade-offs, with dynamic expansion being the most seamless option for most users. However, a fixed-size array is often preferred in interpreters that prioritize portability, as it avoids undefined behavior and potential crashes.коз-verticaldata


End-of-line Code

One subtle yet impactful difference lies in the way different operating systems handle end-of-line characters. While Brainfuck programs typically use the classic newline character (ASCII code 10) for line terminations, Microsoft platforms often employ the CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) sequence. To ensure compatibility, most BF implementations now default to using 10 as the exclusive newline character. This decision simplifies the writing and interpretation of BF programs across diverse environments.


End-of-file Behavior

One of the more contentious aspects of BF implementations is how they handle the EOF condition. The <,> pointer commands typically behave differently when encountering EOF, with some interpreters setting the cell to 0, while others leave it unchanged. The choice between these options can affect both code readability and performance.

For instance, setting the cell to 0 simplifies writing loops that read data until EOF, making it easier to avoid dealing with negative numbers. On the other hand, setting the cell to -1 ensures that it can be distinguished from any data byte, which is particularly useful for read/write operations involving non-textual data. However, the most universally compatible approach is to leave the cell's value unchanged, as it imposes minimal constraints on program behavior and works seamlessly across different implementations.

Understanding and selecting the appropriate behavior for EOF is just one of the many design choices that make BF both a powerful and flexible language, while also introducing potential complexities for the programmer.

转载地址:http://smoxz.baihongyu.com/

你可能感兴趣的文章
mysql中的concat函数,concat_ws函数,concat_group函数之间的区别
查看>>
MySQL中的count函数
查看>>
MySQL中的DB、DBMS、SQL
查看>>
MySQL中的DECIMAL类型:MYSQL_TYPE_DECIMAL与MYSQL_TYPE_NEWDECIMAL详解
查看>>
MySQL中的GROUP_CONCAT()函数详解与实战应用
查看>>
MySQL中的IO问题分析与优化
查看>>
MySQL中的ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE详解与应用
查看>>
mysql中的rbs,SharePoint RBS:即使启用了RBS,内容数据库也在不断增长
查看>>
mysql中的undo log、redo log 、binlog大致概要
查看>>
Mysql中的using
查看>>
MySQL中的关键字深入比较:UNION vs UNION ALL
查看>>
mysql中的四大运算符种类汇总20多项,用了三天三夜来整理的,还不赶快收藏
查看>>
mysql中的字段如何选择合适的数据类型呢?
查看>>
MySQL中的字符集陷阱:为何避免使用UTF-8
查看>>
mysql中的数据导入与导出
查看>>
MySQL中的时间函数
查看>>
mysql中的约束
查看>>
MySQL中的表是什么?
查看>>
mysql中穿件函数时候delimiter的用法
查看>>
Mysql中索引的分类、增删改查与存储引擎对应关系
查看>>